<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratings: The Good, The Sad And The Drugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/</link>
	<description>Your Source For Simpsons News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>I need to get me some Ignoritall for the swine flu epidemic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to get me some Ignoritall for the swine flu epidemic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>This episode was very good! It had great plot, not so awesome, but good sidestory, and number of viewers is standard, but unfortunately not very high...
And about humor, humor was finally on good-old level as it used to be in &quot;golden seasons&quot; of the show.

I hope that next episodes will be as good as this one, cause this is the only way to get viewers back! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode was very good! It had great plot, not so awesome, but good sidestory, and number of viewers is standard, but unfortunately not very high&#8230;<br />
And about humor, humor was finally on good-old level as it used to be in &#8220;golden seasons&#8221; of the show.</p>
<p>I hope that next episodes will be as good as this one, cause this is the only way to get viewers back! <img src='http://www.simpsonschannel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>I think the Simpsons are finally getting better. This and Gone Maggie Gone are great! For some reason I think the plots are better when they start involving school. The Springfield 50 years from now headlines were pretty funny. I love how angry Milhouse is when Bart gets a girlfriend. I also like how they didn&#039;t have so many references to random things/have the kids using cellphones and iPods a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Simpsons are finally getting better. This and Gone Maggie Gone are great! For some reason I think the plots are better when they start involving school. The Springfield 50 years from now headlines were pretty funny. I love how angry Milhouse is when Bart gets a girlfriend. I also like how they didn&#8217;t have so many references to random things/have the kids using cellphones and iPods a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>i really loved this episode. im glad it wasnt just a repeat of the one with reverend lovejoys daughter. i thought that the whole thing was great, but they could have done a little more/better on lisa&#039;s happy pill thing. not much of a sidestory. (although cheif wiggum getting shot was pretty funny)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really loved this episode. im glad it wasnt just a repeat of the one with reverend lovejoys daughter. i thought that the whole thing was great, but they could have done a little more/better on lisa&#8217;s happy pill thing. not much of a sidestory. (although cheif wiggum getting shot was pretty funny)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DQP</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>DQP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>It was an okay episode, but I didn&#039;t find Lisa&#039;s happy escapades very funny (aren&#039;t I weird, I didn&#039;t like the gas scene in Last Exit either)

Oh well, if more new simpson episodes are like the past few (like gone maggie gone) OFF will be back on their feet

3/5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an okay episode, but I didn&#8217;t find Lisa&#8217;s happy escapades very funny (aren&#8217;t I weird, I didn&#8217;t like the gas scene in Last Exit either)</p>
<p>Oh well, if more new simpson episodes are like the past few (like gone maggie gone) OFF will be back on their feet</p>
<p>3/5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>This one had some great laughs, some glimmers of old-school Simpsons. Willie says: &quot;Don&#039;t compete with my job, you&#039;ll never win&quot;...also the bit about the &quot;dumb trivia&quot; on the squishee cup. This is the type of offbeat humor the Simpsons should get back to. I&#039;d rather see weird or esoteric jokes, even if they fall flat, instead of cheap slapstick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one had some great laughs, some glimmers of old-school Simpsons. Willie says: &#8220;Don&#8217;t compete with my job, you&#8217;ll never win&#8221;&#8230;also the bit about the &#8220;dumb trivia&#8221; on the squishee cup. This is the type of offbeat humor the Simpsons should get back to. I&#8217;d rather see weird or esoteric jokes, even if they fall flat, instead of cheap slapstick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLH</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>SLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I thought Lisa&#039;s story was better than Bart&#039;s. Good episode overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Lisa&#8217;s story was better than Bart&#8217;s. Good episode overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.simpsonschannel.com/2009/04/ratings-the-good-the-sad-and-the-drugly/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simpsonschannel.com/?p=3224#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>Great episode</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great episode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

